Skip to content

US: Lying for AGW, Part CXXXVIII…

August 2, 2012
"And IPCC reports show conclusively that warming-induced mutation will produce the Beast of Revelations by 2035"

“And IPCC reports show conclusively that warming-induced mutation will produce the Beast of Revelations by 2035”

The politicization of climate science is so complete that the lead author of the IPCC’s Working Group II on climate impacts feels comfortable presenting testimony to the US Congress that fundamentally misrepresents what the IPCC has concluded. I am referring to testimony given today by Christopher Field, a professor at Stanford, to the US Senate.

This is not a particularly nuanced or complex issue. What Field says the IPCC says is blantantly wrong, often 180 degrees wrong. It is one thing to disagree about scientific questions, but it is altogether different to fundamentally misrepresent an IPCC report to the US Congress. Below are five instances in which Field’s testimony today completely and unambiguously misrepresented IPCC findings to the Senate….

1. On the economic costs of disasters:

Field: “As the US copes with the aftermath of last year’s record-breaking series of 14 billion-dollar climate-related disasters and this year’s massive wildfires and storms, it is critical to understand that the link between climate change and the kinds of extremes that lead to disasters is clear.”

What the IPCC actually said: “There is medium evidence and high agreement that long-term trends in normalized losses have not been attributed to natural or anthropogenic climate change”

And there are four more cases where Professor Field has been ‘economical’ with the truth.

It’s like what they used to say about Nixon: if he could get away with it he was too wicked to be President, and if he couldn’t he was too dumb.

Roger Pielke Jr.’s Blog

Advertisements

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: